Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 12:05

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Which is the correct Tamil New Year, Thai-1 or Chithirai-1?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Mets to call up Max Kranick to take Kodai Senga's roster spot - SNY
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why are Capri cigarettes so expensive?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
New theory proposes time has three dimensions, with space as a secondary effect - Phys.org
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the best editor base on AI for developers?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Apple Is About to Upgrade Your Current AirPods with Some Neat New Abilities - Gear Patrol